Huawei released kirin 810. How big is the gap between the same 7 nanometers and kirin 980? The answer stunned

Today, huawei released a new Nova series of products. At the beginning of the press conference, it released a new processor, kirin 810 processor. As we all know, huawei's high-end processor is the kirin 980, and its low-end processor is the kirin 710. This year, huawei intends to "expand" its product line by adding a sub-flagship processor, which can avoid the undercutting of high-end processors and the high price of low-end processors.

In fact, we are very curious about the performance of the kirin 810 processor. The processor's designation is kirin's 800 series processor, which is positioned as a sub-flagship. The cpus are clearly powered by snapdragon 730, so how big is the performance gap?

Kirin 810 also adopts the current top-of-the-line technology of 7nm, which is equal to kirin 980, the current fourth 7nm Socl. The processor also USES 8 core architectures. In the case of kylin 980, 2 A76@2.6GHz+2 A76@1.92Ghz+4 A55@1.8Ghz, that is to say, 2+2+4 three-plexus architectures, while kirin 810 USES 2 a76@2.27ghz and 6 A55@1.88GHz 2+6 architecture jungles.

However, from the perspective of CPU performance, we changed the two 2.6ghz + 1.92ghz A76 cores of kylin 980 into two A76 cores with 2.27ghz main frequency. That is to say, in the direction of large core, the performance of kirin 810 reaches about 2800 points, while kirin 980 reaches about 3400 points. Although there is a gap between the performance of kirin and the flagship, the overall performance of the CPU is strong.

In addition to the CPU, there is a customized Mali G52 core, the common version of which has 4 cores, while the customized GPU is the MP6 core. In terms of performance, it has been greatly upgraded from the previous generation kirin 710. In GFX Bench 5.0 test item 1080P Manhattan off-screen ES 3.0, kirin 810 achieved a good score of 55fps, while kirin 710 of 20fps... ; But there is still a gap with kirin 980's decaduclear G76.

There is a certain gap between the actual experience of CPU and GPU, but the newly added AI chip NPU is quite different. The kylin 980 is based on a Cambrian architecture, while the kylin 810 is based on its own Da Vinci NPU. According to the ai-benchmark score shown at the launch, the kylin 810 ranks first with a score of 32,280, while the snapdragon 855 ranks second with a score of 25,428.

Summary: qilin 810 processor, in terms of performance, integrated CPU and GPU are both weaker than the flagship processor. In terms of the current price of Nova5, which is 200 less than kirin's 980 version, there is little choice. The kirin 710 processor, priced at 2000 level, is very competitive and still has a certain gap with the flagship processor.

(disclaimer: this article is transferred from the network, the copyright belongs to the original author, if necessary, please contact us to delete)